Comments on: Bush Censorship http://www.mikeschepker.com/blog/2008/04/bush-censorship/ Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:42:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: shep http://www.mikeschepker.com/blog/2008/04/bush-censorship/#comment-17374 shep Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:15:05 +0000 http://www.mikeschepker.com/blog/?p=678#comment-17374 Well, if they blocked that word because of a policy that Bush put into effect, I would blame it on him. I'm not saying he's sitting behind a computer changing this website's policies. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if the moron didn't know how to use a computer. Well, if they blocked that word because of a policy that Bush put into effect, I would blame it on him. I’m not saying he’s sitting behind a computer changing this website’s policies. In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me if the moron didn’t know how to use a computer.

]]> By: Morydd http://www.mikeschepker.com/blog/2008/04/bush-censorship/#comment-17372 Morydd Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:05:59 +0000 http://www.mikeschepker.com/blog/?p=678#comment-17372 Having read the entire article, I'm not seeing where Bush has anything to do with this. Sounds to me like the operators of the site made a decision, based on their own interpretation of policy. It also sounds like all of the information is still there and still available, just slightly harder to find. That's a fairly loose definition of censorship. Granted, I agree that it's stupid, but I think both of the words in your title are a bit on the "Sky is Falling" level. Having read the entire article, I’m not seeing where Bush has anything to do with this. Sounds to me like the operators of the site made a decision, based on their own interpretation of policy. It also sounds like all of the information is still there and still available, just slightly harder to find. That’s a fairly loose definition of censorship.

Granted, I agree that it’s stupid, but I think both of the words in your title are a bit on the “Sky is Falling” level.

]]>